Yasirsuelman
Member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2025
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
Hey SEO pros — I need your take on a local SEO issue that might be caused by duplicate intent or URL structure.
I manage SEO for a local alloy wheel repair business that only serves one city. We originally had a well-performing service page at:
Later, we added a “more geo-specific” version at:
But after publishing the /city-name/ page, our rankings for “alloy wheel refurbishment city-name” completely stalled — neither page ranks, and impressions dropped hard. I suspect keyword cannibalization or confused intent.
We’re now considering consolidating into a flat, focused URL like:
My questions:
Appreciate any tips or real-world insights
I manage SEO for a local alloy wheel repair business that only serves one city. We originally had a well-performing service page at:
Later, we added a “more geo-specific” version at:
But after publishing the /city-name/ page, our rankings for “alloy wheel refurbishment city-name” completely stalled — neither page ranks, and impressions dropped hard. I suspect keyword cannibalization or confused intent.
We’re now considering consolidating into a flat, focused URL like:
My questions:
- Has anyone seen ranking drops after adding a /service/city/ page for a business that only targets one location?
- Would 301 redirecting both older pages to a new flat URL help regain lost authority and intent clarity?
- For a single-city business, is it better to avoid subfolders entirely?
- Bonus: What’s the best way to cover nearby suburbs (e.g., “Alloy Wheel Refurbishment Shawlands”)? Should we create short area pages like example.com/alloy-wheel-refurbishment-shawlands with hyper-local content, or is there a smarter way?
Appreciate any tips or real-world insights
