Recent content by Bartosz_PRD

If two appeals and the community forum route already failed, I would not start by creating a new profile for the same business/location. That can make the case look like duplicate or circumvention activity and may make the next review harder. I would first build a failure map: 1. exact...

That makes sense, and I should have made that boundary clearer. If Google treats the professional affiliation itself as a conflict-of-interest signal, I would not build the case around “these should be restored because they are professional reviews.” The safer use of the evidence file is to...

I would treat this as two separate questions: review-policy risk and evidence quality. The ethics issue matters, but Google support usually needs a much narrower packet than “our industry cannot ask clients for reviews.” For each removed review, I would preserve a small case file before anything...

I would not assume that paying for Google Voice Premium fixes the underlying issue by itself. The first message is pretty explicit that the risk is the use pattern: commercial / promotional calls, bulk or unsolicited outreach, and application-to-person type communication. A paid tier may change...

I would be careful about starting fresh under the Inc until the old history is mapped clearly. If the PO Box / failed video-verification trail is still attached internally, a new profile with overlapping service area, phone, site, license, or owner data could look like an evasion pattern rather...

Since you have already been told to post on the official Google Business Profile help forum and wait for a Product Expert, I would make that post as narrow as possible. I would frame this as a post-reinstatement review-sync/filtering issue, not as 102 separate review appeals. The packet I...