- Joined
- Dec 12, 2013
- Messages
- 370
- Reaction score
- 105
I have a law firm that has an interesting dilemma:
they have had a longstanding, high ranking domain for workes comp/employment law - lets assume it's something like: make-employers-pay.com (this has been fictionalized as to not reveal the client). When you go to this domain it has the name of the law firm prominent on the page "Spud, tater, Fry and peele Law firm" (again, fictionalized).
They are very succesful with this URL, and it has been around forever. Pretty strong backlinkink profile, etc. However, they want to do more than just workers comp, and want to do things like personal injury, etc.. However, it would be weird to search "personal injury lawyer - Idaho" and then click on a domain that is that descriptive.
So, they created a new website at Spud-tater-fry-peele.com and have that covering everything else they do - the two websites look a like (same logo, same color palette, but, have different content and different WP themes).
I think the new website was the right call but, I wanted to consider the ramifications.
1. They are able to maintain two seperate GMB's for the two businesses
2. While it stinks to not leverage the strength of the old site, I think the concerns about the URL are valid-ish
3. There should be no duplicate content issues
4. They should be able to bleed some of the rank from the one site to the new site.
What do you think - was this the right call? At first, I was unsure about it, especially because the website looked so similar, but now, I think I'm ok with it.
they have had a longstanding, high ranking domain for workes comp/employment law - lets assume it's something like: make-employers-pay.com (this has been fictionalized as to not reveal the client). When you go to this domain it has the name of the law firm prominent on the page "Spud, tater, Fry and peele Law firm" (again, fictionalized).
They are very succesful with this URL, and it has been around forever. Pretty strong backlinkink profile, etc. However, they want to do more than just workers comp, and want to do things like personal injury, etc.. However, it would be weird to search "personal injury lawyer - Idaho" and then click on a domain that is that descriptive.
So, they created a new website at Spud-tater-fry-peele.com and have that covering everything else they do - the two websites look a like (same logo, same color palette, but, have different content and different WP themes).
I think the new website was the right call but, I wanted to consider the ramifications.
1. They are able to maintain two seperate GMB's for the two businesses
2. While it stinks to not leverage the strength of the old site, I think the concerns about the URL are valid-ish
3. There should be no duplicate content issues
4. They should be able to bleed some of the rank from the one site to the new site.
What do you think - was this the right call? At first, I was unsure about it, especially because the website looked so similar, but now, I think I'm ok with it.