- Joined
- Dec 12, 2013
- Messages
- 370
- Reaction score
- 105
I've always had a rather dim view of blogging for most of my local clients. There is a real expense to it, and I'm uncertain of the benefits.
This latest client is a great example. I put in a google filter to see what the traffic from the blog was coming from. This a client that is centrally located in their state, and has NEVER served a client out of their state.
In the last month, the client has seen
- 180 visits to blog content from out of state ( 60% to one good article)
- 9 visits to the blog from in state
I checked the site in WMT, and according to Google, none of the blog content has garnered any links - opensiteexplorer agrees. They have done no outreach with the content.
So, I wouldn't ever delete this content. But, am I wrong to think that they are getting very little value from this, and that the next $500 they spend, shouldn't be on blog content?
I feel that this is probably not uncommon. . . and I'm suspicous that some SEO's use this 'blogging as a traffic driver' to show good traffic growth, even though it probably doesn't help the client much.
I fear I'm too cynical here. Does anyone else think that this a good use of time?
This latest client is a great example. I put in a google filter to see what the traffic from the blog was coming from. This a client that is centrally located in their state, and has NEVER served a client out of their state.
In the last month, the client has seen
- 180 visits to blog content from out of state ( 60% to one good article)
- 9 visits to the blog from in state
I checked the site in WMT, and according to Google, none of the blog content has garnered any links - opensiteexplorer agrees. They have done no outreach with the content.
So, I wouldn't ever delete this content. But, am I wrong to think that they are getting very little value from this, and that the next $500 they spend, shouldn't be on blog content?
I feel that this is probably not uncommon. . . and I'm suspicous that some SEO's use this 'blogging as a traffic driver' to show good traffic growth, even though it probably doesn't help the client much.
I fear I'm too cynical here. Does anyone else think that this a good use of time?