- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 15
Hi everyone,
I've been lurking around here for a while and, usually, I find all the answers I need from you guys. But here's one I couldn't find an answer to.
One doctor client has a separate Google+ page to that of the medical practice. It's titled with just the practitioner's name and different suite numbers differentiate the addresses but they use the same phone number.
To make the pages more distinguishable, Phil Rozek gave some great advice for this scenario by using separate categories (if possible) and pointing the URL to the practitioner's profile page rather than the practice's homepage.
Is this enough or is a unique phone number necessary? And how about a phone extension? I've only found a couple of pieces of info on this.
According to a comment on a great post by Mary Bowling, using phone extensions is okay with Google (although he may just be talking about verifying a page with Google?).
Then in this very forum, Chris McCreery had spoken with a rep at Google who suggested putting an extension number in the second line of the address field (which seems odd).
So, is Google okay with using an extension number? And even if Google gives it the green light, what about other directories? In other words, is an extension number a smart way to go about citation building?
Thanks!
I've been lurking around here for a while and, usually, I find all the answers I need from you guys. But here's one I couldn't find an answer to.
One doctor client has a separate Google+ page to that of the medical practice. It's titled with just the practitioner's name and different suite numbers differentiate the addresses but they use the same phone number.
To make the pages more distinguishable, Phil Rozek gave some great advice for this scenario by using separate categories (if possible) and pointing the URL to the practitioner's profile page rather than the practice's homepage.
Is this enough or is a unique phone number necessary? And how about a phone extension? I've only found a couple of pieces of info on this.
According to a comment on a great post by Mary Bowling, using phone extensions is okay with Google (although he may just be talking about verifying a page with Google?).
Then in this very forum, Chris McCreery had spoken with a rep at Google who suggested putting an extension number in the second line of the address field (which seems odd).
So, is Google okay with using an extension number? And even if Google gives it the green light, what about other directories? In other words, is an extension number a smart way to go about citation building?
Thanks!