Annika Neudecker
Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction score
- 93
Hi all, I'm trying to vet out two conflicting pieces of advice I've heard and figure out which one is correct.
I have an SEO telling me that it's best practice to not use more than five categories in GMB, even if all of the categories are truly relevant to the business. They claim that using more than five leads to category dilution and removing any extra will boost our rankings for the others.
On the other hand, I attended a talk at the WhiteSpark summit about local ranking factors in 2020 where the presenter said that so long as all of the categories are relevant, it's better to have more than less. They claimed that category dilution is no longer a major issue.
In my own experience, even a secondary GMB category can make the difference between ranking and not ranking for a search. So, who's right? Or are they both right to varying degrees?
I have an SEO telling me that it's best practice to not use more than five categories in GMB, even if all of the categories are truly relevant to the business. They claim that using more than five leads to category dilution and removing any extra will boost our rankings for the others.
On the other hand, I attended a talk at the WhiteSpark summit about local ranking factors in 2020 where the presenter said that so long as all of the categories are relevant, it's better to have more than less. They claimed that category dilution is no longer a major issue.
In my own experience, even a secondary GMB category can make the difference between ranking and not ranking for a search. So, who's right? Or are they both right to varying degrees?