Hi All,
I know there has been much discussion about which version is best to use, but with all the latest changes happening in Google lately, I thought I'd weigh in on 'today's' general consensus on suite number.
We have a client who has substantially more citations when using STE instead of # or Suite.
There are no reviews and few rankings associated with the Google Plus local page, so I'm tempted to change it to STE to match the citations, but I remember Linda once saying Google never uses STE.
Also the mapmaker guys have always said to spell it out completely.
Here's the landscape we're facing:
- The Google Plus local listing shows # (this is in the new updated dashboard as well)
- Mapmaker shows no suite at all.
- The vast majority of citations show STE. (12,800 vs. little to none displaying with other variations)
What would you suggest? If we keep it as is, should all citations be updated as well or does Google now know STE and # means the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your input!
I know there has been much discussion about which version is best to use, but with all the latest changes happening in Google lately, I thought I'd weigh in on 'today's' general consensus on suite number.
We have a client who has substantially more citations when using STE instead of # or Suite.
There are no reviews and few rankings associated with the Google Plus local page, so I'm tempted to change it to STE to match the citations, but I remember Linda once saying Google never uses STE.
Also the mapmaker guys have always said to spell it out completely.
Here's the landscape we're facing:
- The Google Plus local listing shows # (this is in the new updated dashboard as well)
- Mapmaker shows no suite at all.
- The vast majority of citations show STE. (12,800 vs. little to none displaying with other variations)
What would you suggest? If we keep it as is, should all citations be updated as well or does Google now know STE and # means the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your input!