- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 2
I have 9 (active) local SEO clients
I've had 17 total over the past few years (I dropped most, some dropped me)
In each and every case I employed the exact same strategy for ranking in Google Places for each and every one.
In all instances my client (eventually) either earned the #1 or at a minimum the #2 slot in Google Places ( earning an A red bubble icon in the maps or a B red bubble icon)
Recently I had a failure, now in the past Google used to make one change in the algorithm and the SEO community would compare notes, within a couple weeks or so we'd have had the opportunity to reverse engineer what G did and compensate accordingly.
Now it seems, G refreshes Panda (monthly?) (a spam filter from their perspective and a penalty from our perspective) AND simultaneously adds a "trust factor" ( me paraphrasing here) ranking factor for what it deems "quality content".
If G is going to combine a penalty update with a quality update... that makes it pretty darn impossible to reverse engineer with the degree of certainty that we enjoyed in the past.
The failure I alluded to above had this main difference:
Most of my small business clients have zero idea of what to do, they defer to me and my experience for all things digital marketing.
This failure was from a mid sized company were the business development manager was under extreme pressure from the CEO to provide "instant ROI"
they studied as much as a layman could ascertain about SEO and undertook paying Yodle for their citation building services simultaneously while I did my thing.
Yodle gave their citations a tracking phone number (effectively diluting the consistency of the NAP data cluster)
Also I'm beginning to suspect knocking out all of your citations in "one fell swoop" triggered an "unnatural" uptick in citations, resulting in an Over Optimization Penalty
Now I only have the > 20 clients to compare notes with (give or take)
Rand Fishkin has access to hundreds if not thousands to compare notes with
My question is: has anyone here had a similar experience with either Yext or Yodle?
When I build citations one or two a day, spread out over a period of weeks... my client dominates G Places
When one elects to use "the silver bullet" and get all of them at once... has that triggered a penalty for your local SEO clients?
thanks
I've had 17 total over the past few years (I dropped most, some dropped me)
In each and every case I employed the exact same strategy for ranking in Google Places for each and every one.
In all instances my client (eventually) either earned the #1 or at a minimum the #2 slot in Google Places ( earning an A red bubble icon in the maps or a B red bubble icon)
Recently I had a failure, now in the past Google used to make one change in the algorithm and the SEO community would compare notes, within a couple weeks or so we'd have had the opportunity to reverse engineer what G did and compensate accordingly.
Now it seems, G refreshes Panda (monthly?) (a spam filter from their perspective and a penalty from our perspective) AND simultaneously adds a "trust factor" ( me paraphrasing here) ranking factor for what it deems "quality content".
If G is going to combine a penalty update with a quality update... that makes it pretty darn impossible to reverse engineer with the degree of certainty that we enjoyed in the past.
The failure I alluded to above had this main difference:
Most of my small business clients have zero idea of what to do, they defer to me and my experience for all things digital marketing.
This failure was from a mid sized company were the business development manager was under extreme pressure from the CEO to provide "instant ROI"
they studied as much as a layman could ascertain about SEO and undertook paying Yodle for their citation building services simultaneously while I did my thing.
Yodle gave their citations a tracking phone number (effectively diluting the consistency of the NAP data cluster)
Also I'm beginning to suspect knocking out all of your citations in "one fell swoop" triggered an "unnatural" uptick in citations, resulting in an Over Optimization Penalty
Now I only have the > 20 clients to compare notes with (give or take)
Rand Fishkin has access to hundreds if not thousands to compare notes with
My question is: has anyone here had a similar experience with either Yext or Yodle?
When I build citations one or two a day, spread out over a period of weeks... my client dominates G Places
When one elects to use "the silver bullet" and get all of them at once... has that triggered a penalty for your local SEO clients?
thanks