- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 540
- Solutions
- 13
- Reaction score
- 443
Hi Guys,
We have a client that has ONE company name and has had a physical location in Papillion (a city that borders Omaha). He's had the physical location for the past 8 years and does OK with his local rankings. Customers do come his physical location, or he can go to theirs.
He also has a location in Omaha proper, but it's a location that only his employees go to and use it as a base of operations for their mobile business. No customers come to this location.
Each have a different phone number, and each are answered as "XXXX located in YYYY". (where X is the company name, and Y is the city location they called.)
With the recent changes in Google's Local Pack, he's wanting to get the Omaha location on the map, as well as the Papillion location. While setting the Omaha location as a service area is fine, it would overlap the Papillion location too.
Are there any issues with this on the display map? Anything that we need to watch out for?
We have a client that has ONE company name and has had a physical location in Papillion (a city that borders Omaha). He's had the physical location for the past 8 years and does OK with his local rankings. Customers do come his physical location, or he can go to theirs.
He also has a location in Omaha proper, but it's a location that only his employees go to and use it as a base of operations for their mobile business. No customers come to this location.
Each have a different phone number, and each are answered as "XXXX located in YYYY". (where X is the company name, and Y is the city location they called.)
With the recent changes in Google's Local Pack, he's wanting to get the Omaha location on the map, as well as the Papillion location. While setting the Omaha location as a service area is fine, it would overlap the Papillion location too.
Are there any issues with this on the display map? Anything that we need to watch out for?