We recently had a client (Plastic surgeon in Montreal) complain about a review not showing.
Eventually (two weeks of repeatedly prodding Support), we received the following email:
Now, I have many questions:
Eventually (two weeks of repeatedly prodding Support), we received the following email:
Although we were aware of google having the ability and wherewithal to do so, this is the first time hearing about this.Thanks for reaching out to us.
We reserve the right to disable certain user-generated contributions for individual Business Profiles and business categories. Some Business Profiles have been temporarily disabled from adding new reviews or replies to reviews. We are closely monitoring affected Business Profiles but are not able to provide an estimate on when we can restore the functionality.
Now, I have many questions:
- Could this email be misleading and refer specifically to that review and not a restriction of all reviews?
- Because of complicated communication issues, I have no idea whether the current lapse of seven months since the last review is generally abnormal.
- It is NOT abnormal in so far as we've had clients who have refused to do any review efforts for years (or they just assume "five stars. job done forever"), but I do not know about this client specifically.
- Specifically, could this be linked to the word "breasts" in the review, especially in combination with "nailed"?
- There have been stupider keyword blocks before!
- We've had posts and services blocked before in that vertical because of that word (or to be precise, it's french version), as well as words like"buttocks" and in other verticals for "Clitoris" (for a sex health clinic) and "urine"/"excrements" (in pest control).
- By extension, could a general presence of that word have triggered an overall block of reviews?
- This client has repeatedly asked to report negative reviews in the past. Could this have triggered a flag intended for negative review attacks?