I still say no. That's not the way those types of links were intended.
The real value of no-follow links is the benefit of traffic, awareness, and brand-trust building as I mentioned. No-follow links were designed to indicate they are not trustworthy or not a true editorially placed link (eg, paid). Google should not (and probably will not) make those a direct ranking factor for that reason.
The true power is not ranking. It's driving traffic to your website that could convert. I have no problem with getting no-follow links, as long as the sites are relevant.
If I get a link on Forbes that is a relevant article, creates a ton of buzz, and I can see it's driving relevant traffic to my site... why would I care if it's no-follow? Sure it doesn't help my site rank better, but ill take sales > ranking any day.
Trust and authority does not necessarily correlate with ranking. Think of all the spammy niches that blast PBN links. They rank better because they have a solid system (for now) of flooding their sites with do-follow links, not because they actually did any real marketing for their business.
My argument in a nutshell is that no-follow links can still have significant value... just not as a direct ranking signal.