I would like to add to my LSA experience on behalf of a social security disability attorney client. The setup for the ad was difficult - rejection after rejection of her picture, many times the same picture rejected for different reasons, other times no reason given. I called LSA several times for help, told someone would call back, and they never did. E-mails to LSA were ignored. Finally, by hook or crook on my part, a picture passed.
My attorney is in a major metro area, but he was shocked when the first worthless lead from the LSA (in his business its 10+ leads to get one good case) cost him $131. Partly my bad - I should have checked the cost estimator which did indicate that outrageous charge level in his metro area.
Next I decided to look into some surrounding areas. I found, a bit to my surprise, that I could add regional areas that did show much lower estimated charges. Wondering just how far google would let me stray from my client's metro location (it is "local" service ad, after all), I added a city 2000 miles away and was shocked to see google dutifully added that city to my areas of coverage. I of course deleted that distance area.
But when leads came in from the nearby rural areas I did add to the coverage area - areas with much lower estimated charges - I found they were charged at the very same rate that I had incurred with my initial listing in the major metro area!
This product is so not ready for our clients, and I am bit surprised I do not see here or in other locations more robust investigations and indeed warnings about this dicey product. This looks to me like an attempt to undercut and replace the non-revenue producing local pack. Meaningful antitrust action against Google cannot come soon enough for me!