Google giving extra weight to proximity affecting ranking

[chriscc]

Morning Joy, yes definitely impacting - calls/directions/clicks down. Yes, chrome browser searches still show local packs (no AI overviews), and the local pack results are like the maps results (i.e. proximity prioritised)

 

[Nycnite]

I'm not sure if you are aware, but in October Bright stopped using Google search pack rankings for their grids and use map search rankings instead. The difference in rankings between the two can be vastly different.

I think it was a boneheaded move because most people are likely using search, not maps, to find "plumber Houston", etc.

 

[aldo_quantic]

The jump from 27 to 123 distinct businesses in the top three is more useful here than average rank, since changing the search depth can distort that average. I'd keep the original 11×11 coordinates and 200 m spacing fixed, then compare the share of pins in the top three within separate distance bands from each business, before and after the change. A loss mainly on the outer pins, with the nearest pins holding up, would support the proximity explanation without proving an algorithm change. Since you've already checked a dozen points while logged in, I'd use those same points to record the search pack and map results separately, with the exact query and time, rather than assume the two surfaces match. Also split the queries with a neighbourhood name from those without one, given the difference you noted in post #19.

 

[chriscc]

Hi Aldo, fully agree, the count of businesses occupying top3 spots in a grid tells us much of what we need to know; I also am not a big fan of average rank. I'll start comparing search pack and map results - that would be interesting. I generally only use grids without specifying a neighbourhood name as I just want the 'raw' heatmap by keyword. I'm certain the change is to emphasise proximity, as the podcast Joy linked to explains