- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 12
I am considering locations for a change of office in a major suburban area. On an antidotal basis, I know my competitors tend to be clustered in the main city, and a few suburbs. I have identified several suburbs in which I know of few competitors. To further test, I do a search for my practice area like "{law type} lawyer in {TargetBurb}. The Google pack results are all off point. 2 do not have a remotely matching business category - nor do the websites of these firms indicate they practice {law type}. The other is a listing for an attorney that did {law type} and is listed as "temporarily closed". This office is indeed closed but not temporarily: man has been dead for over 5 years!
Are these incredibly bad results a sign of Google algo stupidity, or is it a sign that {TargetBurb} is indeed underserved in {lawtype}? That is, is Google saying, "well gee this is the best I can do"?
It is interesting to me - why would the algo not simply go out wider in its search? Isn't it better to show a lawyer that in fact practices {lawtype} - even if 10 miles away from {TargetBurb} rather than pick a non-matching practice area?
Are these incredibly bad results a sign of Google algo stupidity, or is it a sign that {TargetBurb} is indeed underserved in {lawtype}? That is, is Google saying, "well gee this is the best I can do"?
It is interesting to me - why would the algo not simply go out wider in its search? Isn't it better to show a lawyer that in fact practices {lawtype} - even if 10 miles away from {TargetBurb} rather than pick a non-matching practice area?