More threads by Oliver Keates

I occasionally help use the tools to help with a bit of rewriting. I'm often a little terse in my prose, the AI tools can make it more friendly.

Claude created a whole plugin for me the other day. Took me a couple of hours to sort out the CSS but saved me a ton of time.
 
Similar to @fisicx we take a lot of our hand audit information and notes, drop it into chatgpt, and then have it write up in plain English what is happening. We found that if we put in the prompt "the client has severe ADHD" or similar phrasing, then the breakdown is much easier to comprehend :)

In terms of actually having it do an audit - I guess you could have it look at a URL, but beyond reading content for flow, I haven't found it useful from an audit perspective (compared to my handwritten notes)
 
Just done some tests using a number of AI tools and the SEO audit they did was quite laughable.

One tool suggested doing guest blogging!

Another thought it was an affiliate site (it's not).

Most of the audit was very generic and offered little detail outside any non-AI auditing tool.
 
My favorite use so far is downloading a csv file from Google Search Console and uploading that to ai and asking it to analyze the file looking for anomalies and make recommendations for topical clusters, internal linking and look for content gaps we may have overlooked.
 
I have found Gemini to be helpful to analyze and point out areas of improvement for a webpage in regard to E-E-A-T. Mostly to help me see things I may have overlooked.

I keep forgetting Gemini exists. I used to use it for the notebook feature and determining cross linking between articles - but ChatGPT stated to do a better job and I never went back. I need to re-look at Gemini again, I know they're always improving.
 
Pretty much all the posts here indicate using AI on existing data and content not as a starting point. As always though, never trust the response - AI as quite good at making things up - check your homework!
 
Back
Top Bottom